City Hall had put off the River District's requests for more funding, saying downtown "has the same problems." So the district's director commissioned a survey. On a Sunday evening two surveyors walked downtown's most littered mile. Then, over three days, they walked every street of the district and photographed every issue they passed.
▶Watch the survey, street by street
For litter, it had more. For people living outside and for dumping, it was not close. These rates are per mile of street, the whole district against the stretch the Downtown Sacramento Partnership picked as downtown's most littered.
more litter per mile downtown, and 7.9 times the graffiti and stickers.
the temporary shelters per mile in the River District: 321 tents, other shelters and RVs lived in, against 2 tents downtown. Without the 13 RVs it is 7.3 times.
the garbage piles and large items, each pile 50 to 1,000+ pieces, and 1.8 times the human waste and needles.
Downtown is one walk on one evening, so its small counts (2 tents, 7 garbage piles and large items) make those ratios rough. Both surveyors walked every street, so rates are per mile of street covered, not per mile walked.
Each claim from the October 2021 blog post and a 2026 Rubbish talk, against the open data.
| Source | What it said | The data |
|---|---|---|
| Blog, October 2021 | "Over 17,000 issues across 27 linear miles were recorded in 3 days." | 17,039 records in the River District over June 7 to 9, on 25.6 miles of street. With the downtown mile walked the Sunday before: 18,606 records on 26.8 miles of street. |
| Blog, October 2021 | "In total, we tracked 12 categories of issues." | The file records 25 types, with litter split by material. Grouped the way the report's table groups them, they make 12 categories, plus 4 records of "other". |
| Blog, October 2021 | "The River District has a 39x higher occurrence of Temporary Shelters." | 78 against 2 on the report's two worst miles: 39 times as many. The blog counts tents and RVs as temporary shelters, and so does this page. Across the whole district, per mile of street, it is 7.6 times (7.3 times without the 13 RVs). |
| Blog, October 2021 | "The River District has an 8x higher occurrence of Garbage Piles." | 54 against 6 on the two worst miles is 9 times as many (the report's table says 800% more, which is where the 8 comes from). Across the whole district, per mile of street, garbage piles and large items are 1.8 times. |
| Rubbish talk, April 2026 | "25 miles covered in 2.5 days." | 25.6 miles of street in the district, from 9:04 am on Monday, June 7 to 4:52 pm on Wednesday, June 9: two full days and an afternoon. |
| Rubbish talk, April 2026 | "15,000+ pieces logged with material, GPS, and photo." | 15,701 pieces of litter in the district, each a photo with a location and a type. 17,039 records counting graffiti, piles and other conditions. |
| Rubbish talk, April 2026 | "Findings were used to secure additional funding." | Not something the data can show. |
The report the River District received compared one mile downtown with the district's own worst mile. That is where the 39x and 8x in the blog post come from. The downtown column matches the open data exactly; a box around the report's district corner comes within a few on every row.
| Issue | Downtown | District | In the file | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temporary shelters | 2 | 78 | 79 | 39x more in the district |
| Garbage piles | 6 | 54 | 54 | 9x more in the district |
| Large items | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9x more in the district |
| Poop and urine | 4 | 5 | 5 | about the same |
| Fire residue | 0 | 2 | 2 | none seen downtown |
| Needles | 0 | 1 | 1 | none seen downtown |
| Dead rodents | 0 | 3 | 3 | none seen downtown |
| Small litter | 1,394 | 849 | 858 | 1.6x more downtown |
| Trash cans | 7 | 3 | 3 | 2.3x more downtown |
| Graffiti | 104 | 20 | 16 | 5.2x more downtown |
| Stickers and fliers | 49 | 0 | 0 | none seen in the district |
Downtown and District are slide 29 of the 2021 report. The downtown column matches this file's Sunday-evening records exactly. The district's mile is the corner the report maps on slide 30, walked on Monday morning; a box of about 350 m by 270 m around it in the file gives the counts in the fourth column, 8 of 11 exactly the report's (in green) and the rest within a few (that column shows on a wider screen). The comparison at the top of the page uses the whole district instead.
Sunday evening downtown, then three days in the district. Four times the camera slows down to follow one surveyor.
Press play for June 6 to 9 in 129 seconds. Nights are skipped. It ends with photos from the survey.
One evening downtown, then two full days and an afternoon in the district. Miles of street count each stretch once, however many times it was walked.
Surveyor A tagged more issues; the routes show both walked nearly the same streets.
Matching each of Surveyor A's photos to Surveyor B's photo nearest in time, taken within a minute of it (11,565 pairs), the two were within 32 m of each other half of the time, and within 50 m 67% of the time: usually across the street from each other, each recording their own side.
18,606 records in five groups, each sorted by hand into one of 25 types. Cigarette butts led; 233 garbage piles each held 50 to 1,000 or more pieces that were counted once.
These records point at people. They count in every total on this page and in the bars of the replay, but they are left off the map, and the open data gives their location only to about 110 m. The camera's close-ups were chosen where almost none were recorded.
The survey recorded them so services could reach the people living there. Fire residue was tracked for the same reason: fires that spread from encampments had caused millions of dollars of damage in the district.
Let's take a moment to pause and acknowledge that each dot on the previous map represents a living space for a human being.
"We felt like some of our colleagues at City Hall didn't understand the magnitude of the problem."Jenna Abbott, Executive Director, River District (2021)
She planned to use it for grant applications, to show the city and the county where more resources were needed, and to measure progress year over year. After she shared it:
"They were shocked, dismayed, extremely interested, and very motivated."Jenna Abbott, on how her colleagues reacted
A few of the 18,606 photos. Each was checked at full size: photos of people, shoes, shadows, cars, belongings and tents are not shown.











